Politics from the Palouse to Puget Sound

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Did I hit a Nerve?

After reading TV Reed's latest letter to the editor, I have to wonder if that was a direct response to my last post PBS Construction Ground Breaking.



Responsible development

Of the many lies told about the Pullman Alliance for Responsible Development, surely the silliest is that PARD is "anti-growth." Over the past three years, PARD has supported 18 significant commercial developments and opposed a grand total of two (Wal-Mart and the Crimson Village strip mall built on a flood plain). Of the more than 20 new apartments and housing developments, PARD has opposed a grand total of one (a development on a wetlands right next to the high school). We also opposed one conditional use permit, for the Cordova, because it meant less development, favoring instead a plan to develop a series of shops around a renovated theater.

Responsible development is not zero development. It is just what is says it is - development that responsibly contributes to the economic, environmental and cultural health of the community.

And right now we have before us an excellent example of what a responsible new commercial development looks like - the expanded Moscow-Pullman Building Supply. It is also everything the proposed Wal-Mart Supercenter is not. This is a locally owned, longstanding business that already has given much to the community. It is a business known for excellent service, fair prices, and for treating its employees well. It is a store of significant but not overwhelming size that, unlike Wal-Mart, will not compete unfairly with other local businesses. It fills the need for development on Bishop Boulevard without creating huge traffic problems or impinging on our cemetery. It addresses our loss of business to Moscow by addressing the one shortcoming of the current store - its limited stock.

MPBS's plan shows we can expand businesses from a local base in ways that address our need for more choices without in the process destroying what we have already.

This development offers a model of how we might continue to develop our town. But as part of a rapidly, haphazardly growing Bishop-Grand area, it also makes clear that we need a series of truly open public meetings to plan for the optimal, responsible growth of Pullman.

T.V. Reed

Pullman

2 comments:

Sarcastic Housewife said...

Loved it! I hope you hit a lot of nerves!

Scotty said...

Posted on the Dnews.com website in the thread where I obtained TV Reed's Letter to the Editor.

"Interesting, you said that PARD opposed the "Crimson Village", yet I never saw lawsuits, surveys, grand studies, etc. It is easy to post a notice on a website and claim to be against something. Once again PARD's actions speak louder than its words?

Also, I find it odd that loss of dollars to Moscow is nodded here. PARD has said over and over, that we should not duplicate what Moscow has, but find other business areas Moscow does not have in order to compliment the Palouse area for shopping. With that said Moscow has a big building supply. Why should Pullman build one? By PARD's own argument, we should be against such a development. Also it will take a business from downtown.

Again, PARD claims over and over they are not anti-WalMart, but their ACTIONS speak way more loud and more true than their words have ever spoken. " -- Lobo