Every year, the Association of Washington Business hands out the Cornerstone Award to Washington legislators who vote for business-friendly legislation and vote against legislation that would further erode the state’s competitiveness.
How did our 9th District legislators fare this year?
Sen. Mark Schoesler (R-Ritzville), Rep. Steve Hailey (R-Mesa), and Rep. Joe Schmick (R-Colfax) all received the 2008 Cornerstone Award. In order to receive the award, legislators must vote in support of the business community more than 80 percent of the time.
According to AWB's 2008 Legislative Report Card, Sen. Shoesler received a rating of 91%, Rep. Hailey received a rating of 100%, and Rep. Schmick received a rating of 92%.
As ourt district border Oregon and Idaho, we need to make sure our state remains a competitive place to do business. That is why we need Mark, Steve, and Joe back in Olympia next session.
Politics from the Palouse to Puget Sound
Showing posts with label Competitiveness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Competitiveness. Show all posts
Saturday, August 09, 2008
Our 9th District Legislators and Business Competitiveness
Labels:
Association of Washington Business,
Competitiveness,
Joe Schmick,
Mark Schoesler,
Steve Hailey,
Washington 2008 Vote,
Washington Business Unfriendly,
Washington Legislature,
Washington Politics
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Hawkins 3-Fer, Part Three
As the Hawkins Stateline Retail Center gets closer to reality and a Revenue Development Area is created on the Washington side of the border, Moscow is not sitting idly by.
Brushing aside Queen Nancy's "Peace Through Sustainability" policy, the new Moscow City Council has now approved the Thompson rezone that was the point of such controversy two years ago when Wal-Mart wanted to build there.
Expect an announcement soon that Wal-Mart or another big-box store will be locating on the 41 acre property.
Instead of socialist meddling, now we have good old fashioned capitalist competition, the way it was meant to be. All we ever wanted was a level playing field
From today's Moscow-Pullman Daily News:
Brushing aside Queen Nancy's "Peace Through Sustainability" policy, the new Moscow City Council has now approved the Thompson rezone that was the point of such controversy two years ago when Wal-Mart wanted to build there.
Expect an announcement soon that Wal-Mart or another big-box store will be locating on the 41 acre property.
Instead of socialist meddling, now we have good old fashioned capitalist competition, the way it was meant to be. All we ever wanted was a level playing field
From today's Moscow-Pullman Daily News:
Council OKs rezone of Thompson property; Land made controversial during 2006 rezone request now available for motor business use
A large chunk of farmland in southeast Moscow is now ready for business after a rezone request was approved by the City Council on Monday.
The Thompson Family Limited Partnership owns the 41.4-acre plot just south of the Troy Highway across from Sunset Memorial Gardens Cemetery previously zoned for agriculture/forestry uses. The land is now zoned for motor business, meaning it will be available for retail, professional and medical businesses, as well as bars, restaurants and other businesses.
The Thompsons attempted to have a larger parcel of the property rezoned in 2006. The controversial request stemmed from Wal-Mart's plans to build a super center on the 77-acre parcel and met resistance from the Moscow No Super Wal-Mart group.
The City Council at the time decided to reject the rezone.
Monday's approval came with two conditions: any future developer must provide a traffic impact study and make any needed traffic improvements or changes to accommodate drivers, and developers must preserve the natural area between the property and nearby Paradise Path.
No businesses are set to build on the property yet, but Susan Wilson, an attorney representing the Thompson family, said it is an attractive piece of land for retail and motor businesses.
"It seemed pertinent to give businesses some incentive to move in," Wilson said of the approval.
She said the plot is adjacent to two major arterials and near many other retail businesses, making it conducive to commercial use.
All but one City Council member voted in favor of the rezoning. Tom Lamar voted against it after expressing concerns about the city spreading its interests in too many places at once. The city's lack of direction could stunt further commercial growth, he said.
"I think we're all interested in seeing growth and development in Moscow," Lamar said. "We need to concentrate on one area."
Lamar also raised questions about public buildings like schools possibly constructing on the Thompson site. The new zoning makes it more difficult for schools to build on the property than businesses, he said.
Lamar said the timing isn't right for the city.
"This may be a great area to build on in the future," he said, adding there already are many scattered motor business zones in town that have remained vacant for years.
Other council members ultimately decided the family can do what it wants with the land. Councilman John Weber said the Thompsons are responsible developers in Moscow.
Wilson agreed, saying the family has contributed to the community over the years.
"The Thompson family is doing this because they truly believe the community needs to have something to offer," she said.
Monday, April 23, 2007
"AWB Urges Lawmakers to Consider Businesses in Washington's Border Counties"
A press release from the Association of Washington Business, dated April 12, 2007:
OLYMPIA—"The sharp contrast between the cost of doing business in Washington compared to its neighboring states should be of primary concern to lawmakers," said Don Brunell, president of the Association of Washington Business.Instead, the legislature just passed a five-week paid family leave bill, making Washington the only state to have such a program other than California. This combined with more stringent environmental regulations that were passed make us even less competitive with Idaho and Oregon. Meanwhile, the legislature did nothing to reinstitute property tax caps, land use regulation reform, or B&O tax reform that would make Washington more competitive.
Brunell, who has spent the past few days meeting with chamber and business leaders in eastern Washington, said he was reminded of the competition between Clarkston and its "twin city" Lewiston, which is just over the Snake River in Idaho.
"Both cities fight hard for business. While Clarkston offers more readily available commercial property, Lewiston offers Idaho’s lower business and regulatory costs," said Brunell. "These are important considerations for businesses that are already on the border and looking for more affordable opportunities. Likewise, these are also important considerations for large businesses, like Costco or Home Depot, who may be looking at siting a new facility."
In the Milken Institute’s 2005 Cost of Doing Business Index, Idaho ranks as the nation’s 46th most expensive state to do business, while Oregon ranks 30th. In comparison, Washington ranks eighth. The differences are staggering—especially in border counties that lack the economic security that the Puget Sound region provides.
Idaho stays competitive by offering generous incentives to Washington businesses. "Unless lawmakers keep border counties in mind and pass legislation that provides them with regulatory relief, Washington may lose business to their more business-friendly neighbors," said Brunell.
Labels:
Competitiveness,
Small Business,
Washington Politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)