tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13796804.post6048531438405352318..comments2023-09-06T05:58:02.522-07:00Comments on Palousitics: Didier Favors Impregnation By RapeUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13796804.post-34947037736510112272010-08-23T10:00:07.026-07:002010-08-23T10:00:07.026-07:00kingstonJW,
I am not saying that Didier favors imp...kingstonJW,<br />I am not saying that Didier favors impregnation by incest or rape. What I am saying is, that if we apply the same logic as the Didier campaign, that this must be the case.<br /><br />Didier is deliberately trying to suggest that Dino Rossi is not pro-life, despite Rossi's long record to the contrary.<br /><br />In another context, I am a second amendment rights supporter, but believe it is reasonable to restrict the ownership of 155mm howitzers. This does not mean that I am for "gun control". (Unless we use Didier campaign logic.)<br /><br />Didier needs to stop his slime-ball tactics in his attempts to damage Rossi, especially now that the primary is over.Jason R. Raineshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15009912822792820810noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13796804.post-88559474948817866722010-08-23T09:10:27.093-07:002010-08-23T09:10:27.093-07:00I am not nor have been a Didier supporter but your...I am not nor have been a Didier supporter but your implication that he favors impregnation by rape or incest is simply incorrect and terribly misleading. I challenge you to show proof that he favors such illegal violence against women or make a correction. What may be true is that he does not favor abortion regardless of how the woman was impregnated, and that is unfortunate enough in itself. It seems to me a public crime to force a woman to carry such an atrocity against her without her consent.KingstonJWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18265206095526759609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13796804.post-91984389033644306742010-08-21T23:35:27.638-07:002010-08-21T23:35:27.638-07:00Thank you so much for writing a story about this--...Thank you so much for writing a story about this--I was shocked to hear that he is not in favor of emergency contraception for women who have been raped! I have taken on several people who have been Didier supporters and also the Washington Life Coalition on FB and I cannot believe these folks. So, if a man cannot have a particular woman or girl, he can rape her in the hopes of impregnating her, and if Didier had his way, she would not be allowed to have emergency contraception to prevent an unwanted pregnancy? I think this is a sick and cruel position to put all women of childbearing age in, be they 11 years old or 45 years old. I am a pro-life Christian but I am in favor of emergency contraception in cases of rape. It can prevent an abortion at a later stage of pregnancy if used correctly and shortly after a woman has been raped.naboudarahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07702139011941925516noreply@blogger.com